page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135
page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139
page 140
page 141 page 142
page 143
page 144
page 145
page 146
page 147
page 148
page 149
page 150
page 151
page 152
page 153
page 154
page 155
page 156
page 157
page 158
page 159
page 160
page 161
page 162
page 163
page 164
page 165
page 166
page 167
page 168
page 169
page 170
page 171
page 172
page 173
page 174
page 175
page 176
page 177
page 178
page 179
page 180
page 181
page 182
page 183
page 184
page 185
< prev - next > Energy Hydro power civil_works_guidelines_for_micro_hydro (Printable PDF)
CIVIL WORKS GUIDELINES FOR MICRO-HYDROPOWER IN NEPAL
139
Figure 10.2 Proposed arrangement for bursting disc installation in
micro-hydro schemes
More information on the applicability of bursting discs for
micro-hydro schemes can be obtained from Dulas Limited
(same address as above).
Information on commercial bursting discs can also be obtained
from the following manufacturer:
IMI Marston Limited
Wobaston Road, Fordhouses,
Wolverhampton WV106QJ
England, UK
Fax: +44 (0) 1902 397792
10.5 Flexible steel support pier for Jharkot
micro-hydro
The 36 kW Jharkot micro-hydro scheme is located in Mustang
District, Nepal. This is a community owned scheme and is
managed by the Jharkot Electrification Committee. Practical
Action in Nepal has been involved in providing technical
support for refurbishment work of this scheme for some time.
Similar to other areas of Mustang, the topography of the project
area consists of fragile and unstable slopes and is prone to
landslides. The intake and the initial headrace canal have
been damaged frequently by landslides and floods. Although
the slope along the penstock alignment is relatively stable
compared to the intake area, it is weak and also prone to
landslides. The existing masonry support piers started sinking
due to their own weight as well as the weight of the penstock
pipe and the water inside it. Hence, the penstock (flange
connected) started to sag at various places. As part of the
preparation of this text, a pilot project was carried out to design
and install steel support piers for the Jharkot scheme with
assistance from Mr. Shyam Raj Pradhan of NYSE. The design
criteria were as follows:
The support pier had to be light, to minimise self weight.
It had to be fabricated using parts that could be carried by
porters or mules. Jharkot is about half a day’s walk from the
district airport and 5 days’ walk from the nearest roadhead.
The design had to allow for the sinking of the foundation.
In case of sinking of the ground below the foundations, the
piers should not pull the penstock pipe down along with it.
The design of the support pier and the foundation are shown
in Figures 10.3 and 10.4 respectively. The total weight of a 2
m support pier is 60 kg (excluding the foundation work)
whereas a masonry pier of similar height would weigh 4000
kg. Note that such support piers should be installed
perpendicular to the penstock alignment (not vertically) since
they are only resisting force Fj (see Chapter 7). The top section
of the pier consists of a channel which is pin connected to two
legs that have turnbuckles. The penstock pipe rests on the
channel and the pin connection allows the channel some
rotation such that it is perpendicular to the penstock alignment.
Two holes have been provided on the channel to clamp the
penstock with a 12 mm diameter bar. The turnbuckles can be
adjusted to fine tune the height of the support piers (up to
300 mm) during installation and in case the foundation sinks
in the future. The bottom of the turnbuckles (40 mm rods) fit
inside a hollow pipe as shown in Figure 10.3. In case the
ground beneath the foundation sinks, the support pier
structure below the turnbuckles drops down along with the
foundation and only the top part (up to the turnbuckle legs)
hangs with the penstock. Hence the penstock pipe is not
dragged down with the pier in case of sinking. The bottom
part of the pier consists of angles which are bolted back to
back (Figure 10.3). Bolt holes at a distance of 150 mm are
provided for coarse adjustment of the pier. The bottom angles
are pin connected to the foundation so that the moments due
to thermal expansion of the penstock pipe are not taken by
the support pier or the foundation.
During installation as well as later in case the foundation sinks,
coarse adjustment can be made using the bolt holes of the bottom
angles and then fine tuned using the turnbuckles at the top. The
top and bottom parts of the pier have fixed heights. The length of
the middle portion (angles bolted to channels) is varied such
that the total pier height is equal to the required height. Note
that this support pier can be dismantled such that there are 12
individual pieces (including the 12 mm stirrup bar to connect to
the penstock). 18 support piers ranging from 1.0 m to 2.6 m
height have been fabricated based on this design. To ensure
that the support pier would function well, one (2.5 m total height)
was tested at the manufacturer’s workshop (NYSE) as shown in
Photographs 10.7 and 10.8. About 500 kg of axial load
(maximum compressive load expected on the pier) was applied
on the pier. There was no observable effect on the pier
(deformation or deflection of angles) during the test of about 2
hours. It was even possible to raise the height of the pier by
rotating the turnbuckles with the full test load of 500 kg.
As of July 1998, all 18 support piers have been installed at the
Jharkot scheme. Their performance is currently being monitored.